Sponsored

Search This Blog

Brian Luke Community Blogger, WGRZ-TV

Saturday, June 9, 2012

Acting Assistant Attorney General Stuart F. Delery Speaks at the American Bar Association’s Ninth National Institute on the Civil False Claims Act and Qui Tam Enforcement



Thank you Joyce for that kind introduction.   And thanks to all of you for being here today.   I appreciate the opportunity this afternoon to share a few of my thoughts about our collective efforts in this important area of False Claims Act enforcement.   As you saw in your first panel today, it is abundantly clear that, twenty-five years after this statute was significantly amended, it remains the government’s most potent civil weapon in addressing fraud against the taxpayers.

Indeed, since coming into this office a few months ago, I have been struck by the sheer volume of the cases that are brought -- and the recoveries that are obtained -- under this statute.   Since January 2009, the Civil Division, working with our partners in the U.S. Attorney offices, has recovered over $11.1 billion under the False Claims Act.   Of this amount, more than $7.4 billion was recovered in health care fraud matters, with the largest recoveries coming from the pharmaceutical and medical device industries.   These are historic figures.

But I want to begin my remarks here this afternoon by acknowledging the man who played such a central role in making this statute the bulwark against fraud that it is today.    The Department sustained a very heavy blow last month when we lost Mike Hertz.  Many of you in this room had the honor of working with and knowing Mike.  The defense bar viewed him as an intelligent and honest broker, and Taxpayers Against Fraud just last year awarded him its Honest Abe Award, commemorating his decades of service.   I know he has been a steady presence at this conference since its inception.  

But those of us in the Department -- those who worked by his side, some for decades -- particularly grieve his passing.    Mike was a colleague, mentor and friend to everyone with whom he worked, and even when they moved on to other endeavors, that mutual friendship and respect remained.   I know that is true for many in this room.  

Mike’s career will forever be associated with the Department’s record-setting success under the False Claims Act.   In 1986, Mike led the Department’s efforts to convince Congress to modernize the Act, removing barriers to proving false claims, and reinvigorating the qui tam or “whistleblower” provisions by encouraging individuals to come forward with evidence and receive up to 30 percent of recoveries.   Since those 1986 amendments, recoveries have topped $33 billion, including more than $22 billion attributable to qui tam claims.  Mike was instrumental in setting the paradigm used so successfully today to investigate and handle cases of fraud against the government. 

Unfortunately, Mike is not the only colleague we have lost recently.    George Vitelli is also missing from our gathering today.   George was a Senior Trial Counsel in the Fraud Section who just last month lost his battle with cancer.  During his career with the Department, George successfully pursued a number of our leading False Claims Act matters.   He often shared his invaluable leadership and guidance with attendees of this conference, when he moderated panels on the ethical issues surrounding False Claims Act litigation.

Mike and George will be dearly missed.  

We are grappling now with the difficult task of finding a new permanent Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Commercial Litigation Branch, but I am happy to say that Joyce Branda has generously agreed to serve as the Acting DAAG while we do so.   Joyce is well-known to most of you and I am sure you will agree that her leadership, knowledge, and sound judgment will serve us well during this period.  I am also pleased that Michael Granston and Dan Anderson have agreed to serve as Acting Directors of the Fraud Section during Joyce’s absence.  

Although this is a period of transition and change within the Civil Division, our False Claims Act work has continued steadily. Last year, more than 630 qui tam matters were filed with the Department – more than in any other year in the history of the Act and an increase of more than 47% since 2009.  More than two-thirds of these cases alleged false claims to government health care programs.   Just last month, the Department announced that Abbott Laboratories would pay $1.5 billion to resolve criminal and civil allegations arising from its illegal marketing of the prescription drug, Depakote.   This was the latest in a series of so-called “off-label marketing” cases in which the Civil Division, working with U.S. Attorneys’ offices around the country, has prosecuted pharmaceutical and device manufacturers who market their products for uses not approved as safe and effective by the FDA. 

But of course the reach of the False Claims Act extends well beyond health care matters.  

We are actively pursuing financial fraud schemes, which can have devastating effects beyond just the Federal Gove rnment, often hitting ordinary Americans directly.   The cornerstone of our work in this area is the interagency Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force, established in November 2009 by the President.   I serve as a co-chair of three of the Task Force’s working groups, all of which bring together the government’s civil and criminal capabilities, from multiple regulatory and enforcement agencies, to enhance our enforcement, prevention, and outreach efforts.  

These benefits are readily apparent in the Department’s recent successes against mortgage fraud.   During the last five months, the Department’s False Claims Act recoveries alone have exceeded $1.2 billion, and the Department played a leading role in negotiating the historic $25 billion settlement agreement with mortgage servicers.  

We have also been vigilant in our efforts under the False Claims Act and other tools to root out fraud in connection with the procurement of goods and services used by our military and civilian agencies, including fraud affecting our men and women fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan.    This type of fraud takes on many forms.   For example, earlier this year, Maersk Line agreed to pay the United States $31.9 Million to resolve claims that Maersk inflated the charges for shipping supplies to Iraq and Afghanistan.   And ATK Launch Systems Inc. agreed to pay nearly $37 Million to resolve allegations that it sold dangerous and defective illumination flares to the Army and the Air Force.   All told, since January 2009, procurement fraud cases have accounted for approximately $1.6 billion in recoveries – which exceeds the amount in any comparable period.

Cases like those I just described are commonly brought to us by relators and their counsel.   Our statistics paint a compelling picture of the impact that the strengthened qui tam provisions have had on the False Claims Act.   Since 1986, nearly 70% of all False Claims Act recoveries can be attributed to qui tam matters.  

Our intervention rate in these matters, however, has remained fairly constant over the decades.  For every ten cases filed by relators, the government ultimately intervenes in only two.  I very much appreciate that the decision to file a qui tam action is often a very difficult one.   Relators are often shunned by their colleagues.   Counsel for relators often put significant time and effort into matters that may never result in a recovery.  

And yet I would be remiss if I did not mention that all too often DOJ attorneys dedicate significant time and effort investigating allegations that are too broadly pled or that are based on faulty information.   I must stress, as have my predecessors who have spoken at this event in the past, the importance of relators filing actions that meet the requirements of the False Claims Act and, in particular, providing enough information to allow us to investigate and evaluate a claim effectively.    Of course, by helping us, you are helping yourselves, as a sufficiently- and accurately-detailed claim enhances the Government’s ability to assess intervention.   Even in those cases in which we do not intervene, a well-pled claim is essential for enabling relators to be prepared to exercise their right under the FCA to serve as private Attorneys General and to take their case forward.   Narrowly drawn and well-pled complaints are far more likely to prevail, as recent cases have demonstrated.

In much the same way, I ask our colleagues in the defense bar to recognize the importance of this work in protecting taxpayer money.   I have heard the charge that qui tam lawsuits represent a cost of doing business, and that qui tam settlements and recoveries should be treated as any other regulatory burden.   Respectfully, this approach misses the point, and does a disservice to your clients.  

Protecting taxpayer dollars is one of the Attorney General’s core priorities.   This includes a commitment to increase our efforts to reduce fraud at the outset.   Although the recoveries I discussed earlier reflect the impressive work of this Department, it would be better if we did not need to bring these cases at all.    The Department is well aware of the fact that litigation can only plausibly reach a fraction of the fraud committed against U.S. Government programs – which likewise makes the prevention of fraud a more potent tool for protecting the interests of the United States than efforts to undo the damage of completed schemes.  

That is why we continue to pursue non-monetary remedies and other measures to help prospectively reduce fraud.  And it is why we want to engage with you and your clients to encourage self-reporting, discuss forward-looking compliance measures, and generally work cooperatively to try to eliminate fraud.   Litigation to recover the costs of fraud is a far inferior option to preventing fraud in the first place.

A quick glance into the future should demonstrate the benefits of this approach.  

As you all know, retiree rolls are swelling – a trend that (along with other legal and demographic changes) will steadily increase the number of people participating in federal health care programs and the number of claims for federal health care benefits.    At the same time, our country is broadly confronted with economic and fiscal challenges, which rightly and predictably result in public outrage whenever hard-earned (and scarce) tax dollars are directed from legitimate and important government programs to improper purposes.  

Given this reality, we must safeguard our public dollars, and we must increase our emphasis on identifying and punishing waste, fraud, and abuse.   So rather than waiting for the government to detect and respond to fraud, I invite you to join with the Department in establishing structures that help prevent fraud – and the need for lawsuits to combat it – in the first instance.

One specific tactic that runs counter to this goal involves efforts by defendants in qui tam cases to “run out the clock” – to drag out compliance with government requests for information in order to force the Department to decline to intervene or forego making an intervention decision, leaving the relator to soldier on alone.     Let me be clear that such a strategy is both destined to fail and contrary to defendants’ own self-interests.  

First, that strategy overlooks recent amendments to the FCA that strengthen our ability to compel information and testimony from targets and other witnesses. As you know, Civil Investigative Demands, or “CIDs,” allow law enforcement to speed up civil investigations by obtaining documents and testimony quickly and under oath.   The authority to issue CIDs has recently been delegated to the Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division.   That authority has, in turn, been re-delegated to U.S. Attorneys around the country in cases primarily handled by those offices.

Since this re-delegation of authority occurred, we have seen an impressive increase in the use of CIDs by Department lawyers.   In the last fiscal year, the Department authorized the issuance of 888 CIDs – more than 10 times the number of CIDs issued during the two years before re-delegation combined.    The current CID procedures mean that efforts to “run out the clock” will only push the Department to compel your clients to produce the information we need, and which they could provide without being subject to this tool.  

Second, and more generally, this approach to potential qui tam litigation ignores the benefits of working collaboratively with the government in its fraud investigations.   Most defendants in FCA matters have come to recognize that there is an enormous benefit to be gained by avoiding what will likely be costly and protracted discovery, trial, and the mandatory treble damages and penalties that will be assessed if the government prevails.  

The more thorough and effective the job defense counsel do investigating the case and presenting their clients’ views of the applicable facts and law, the more likely it is that we will find these defenses persuasive, and the more credit your clients will get from the federal government in negotiated resolutions.   And, I might add, because disclosure and cooperation show a sincere interest in cleaning house – and ensuring a culture of doing the right thing – they can help companies demonstrate the necessary responsibility to continue participating in government programs and contracts.  

There are legal requirements, policies, and practices in place that encourage businesses to combat fraud on their own.   For example, as many of you may know, under the False Claims Act, self-disclosure of violations can mean a reduction in potential damages — either in litigation or during settlement.   So, a decision to come in promptly and work with the government to resolve any liability that may arise from past wrongdoing is more than the right litigation decision.   It is a good economic decision.
I opened my remarks to you this afternoon by mentioning the recent Abbott case, citing it as an example of the latest in our efforts to police illegal marketing of prescription drugs.   But the Abbott case also provides a powerful illustration of the value placed by the Department on prospective measures to ensure future compliance.

We worked with counsel for Abbott to identify innovative, non-monetary measures that would help us to fully redress the wrong and prevent its recurrence.   These measures include:
  • A term of probation for five years which requires Abbott to report any probable violations of the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act to the probation office, and requires that its CEO personally certify compliance with this reporting requirement;
  •  An agreed statement of facts;   
  • A corporate integrity agreement with the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services that requires, among other things, Abbott’s board of directors to review the efficacy of the company’s compliance efforts; and
  • A requirement that Abbott institute policies to ensure that scientific research and any resulting publications foster increased understanding of scientific, clinical or healthcare issues.
These provisions, among others, reflect our view that there will be cases in the future in which obtaining only a monetary recovery will not adequately redress the wrong.     We realize that each case is different and presents its own unique set of facts and circumstances.   We also know that in some instances our seeking non-monetary relief may prolong or prevent settlement discussions.   Nonetheless, it is increasingly our view that we owe it to taxpayers to do our best to implement measures to fully explain the conduct that led to the resolution, and to deter future bad acts.

The Department takes seriously the need to look for fair and just solutions to address fraudulent misconduct and prevent it going forward.   And that need is something that we must meet collectively, as all of us – plaintiffs and defendants, counsel, and the government – each play a role in these cases. That is why I am so pleased to be here and so convinced that conferences such as this play a vital role.   These gatherings enhance our respective practices and our understanding of our respective positions.   They allow all of us to consider – and debate – new ideas and varying perspectives.   

And so I thank our co-chairs of the conference, Jack, Jeb and Dan for bringing together such a terrific faculty and I look forward to working with all of you in the future.

Thank you.

No comments:

Advertiser

NETC LRC News and Information

Advertiser

Technology Headlines

The TSA Blog

FEMA Blog

White House.gov Video Feed

NYSDOT Recent Press Releases

Indian Point Press Releases

Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant EAS Messages

Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant

New York State-Wide RSS

Department of Homeland Security News

Department of Homeland Security Podcasts

Erie County RSS Feed

Erie County Emergency Management

The Weather Channel: Your Local Weather Outlook--Niagara Falls, NY (14304)

FEMA: New York Federal Disaster Declarations

Niagara County RSS Feed

National Weather Service

Albany County RSS Feed

Allegany County RSS Feed

Bronx County RSS Feed

Broome County RSS Feed

Cattaraugus County RSS Feed

Chemung County RSS Feed

Cayuga County RSS Feed

Ontario County RSS Feed

Warren County RSS Feed

City of Toronto News Releases

US Consumer Product Safety Commission - Recent Recalls and Product Safety News

Center for Missing & Exploited Children: NY Missing

Lead Photos - U.S. Dept. of Defense

CBP.gov: Alert - Maritime - Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill

Contract - U.S. Dept. of Defense

Speech - U.S. Dept. of Defense

Transcript - U.S. Dept. of Defense

The Grill Sergeants

FBI Extra

NASA Breaking News

NASA Ames Research Center News and Features

NASACast Video

USGS Earthquake ShakeMaps

City of Toronto news releases, Emergency Medical Services

City of Toronto news releases, Fire Services

Speeches

Advertiser

City of Toronto news releases, Fire Services

Visitor Snapshot

Royalty Free Music.com News

RoyaltyFreeMusic.com Music Reviews

Automobile RSS Feed

Speed and Accuracy Statement

The information you find here is in the form of raw data, usually delivered via RSS feeds. The information is delivered via website in the most rapid manner possible. Usually this is the manner of delivery of information to media. Therefore, this service gets the audience information to the public more rapidly then any media outlet that has to re-write the information for their email club or SMS feeds.

In some cases, cases, from time to time, updates and correctons are offered by the authors of this information, Motioncenter.info is not responisble for the content of RSS feeds, press releases, or any other content. The content of the information presented is the responsiblity of the producer of the content.

There are many reasons for presenting the information as the page does. The public really never has had a view of the raw data before now. Most cases we see news packaged, polished and prioritized. This blog network offers a wide audience a variety of news, some of it is produced by Motioncenter and some by the government or other sources.

Read what you like, ignore what doesn't interest you, but at least Motioncenter doesn;t tell you what the news is, you choose.

Material Connection Disclosure

You should assume that the owner of this website has an affiliate relationship and/or another material connection to the providers of goods and services mentioned on this site and may be compensated when you purchase from a provider. You should always perform due diligence before buying goods or services from anyone via the internet or offline. THIS IS A BLOG. A NON-COMMERCIAL WEBPAGE At no time does commerce transact on this site. If it had then it would require a Secure Sockets Layer certificate and a merchant account. Being a non-commercial site there are some licensing privledges that this site will participate in. Mystuffnow is an online radio station broadcasting twenty four hours daily. This station can be bet described as a hybrid format of adult contemporary, international and ad popular music. In a sense it may, be compared to compared random radio format, but mystuffnow has three dedicated day parts. These day parts include a morning, evening and overnight separate music selection. The morning and afternoon have a selection of classic rock and current hot hits. To make the station more unique a new track, or tracks from the overnight day part have been added to make the station stand out from traditional stations that broadcast locally. The overnight day part is called “After Hours” and mimics the general principals of a quiet storm programming style where as there are fewer commercials and the music is more adult in nature, not just in lyrics but the music is more unique, offering international and slower tracks. This is meant for relaxation or whatever you may be doing in the late night hours. This station is run by computerized traffic software. At any moment a live deejay can broadcast and a morning show or news programming is possible, all playlists are run automatically. One positive of this is the fact that the software ensures that all artists get paid their royalties and this station avoids any fines for digital media issues. Update: Mystuffnow is currently off the air.

No Endorsement Statement

No endorsement is implied nor should it be inferred. No government agency, or organization has endorsed Motioncenter.Info. Motioncenter.info is a media organization with a mission of offering unbiased information as it becomes available, without any form of bias.

Privacy Policy

This is a website run by Group Speeddog Results Marketing, L.L.C... We take our readers privacy very seriously. Promotions through Third Party Merchants While this site is not endorsed or owned by any of the third party merchants appearing on this site, this site may at times receive various types of compensation when a viewer makes a purchase or clicks on a link appearing on this site. This site is not responsible for any claims or warranties associated with any third-party merchant link or website. This site does not directly collect any information regarding its viewers without your prior knowledge and permission; nor does it share their information with third-party vendors or merchants . It is not now, nor ever will be, our practice to sell your information to any third-party under any circumstance. We use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. Google Advertising Cookie and Privacy Policies What is the DoubleClick DART cookie? The DoubleClick DART cookie is used by Google in the ads served on the websites of its partners, such as websites displaying AdSense ads or participating in Google certified ad networks. When users visit a partner’s website and either view or click on an ad, a cookie may be dropped on that end user’s browser. The data gathered from these cookies will be used to help better serve and manage ads on the publisher’s site(s) and across the web. *Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on your site. *Google’s use of the DART cookie enables it and its partners to serve ads to your users based on their visit to your sites and/or other sites on the Internet. *Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy.